Fragmentation and Wholeness Relationship

(Page Updated 5/5/25)

Fragmentation and Wholeness
Superficial and Fundamental
Finite Games and The Infinite Game
Explicate and Implicate Order
Particular and Universal

From the first spark of self‑reflection, humanity has wrestled with a puzzle: why does the world appear splintered into competing parts when, beneath the surface, everything seems woven into an indivisible fabric?

Optima Bowling addresses this perennial tension by placing fragmentation and wholeness at the heart of Section 6: Integrating Fragmentation and Wholeness, where the site's grand arc of Potentiality and Actuality pivots from theoretical exposition to lived reconciliation in the name of human development. This page distills decades of inquiry, drawing on David Bohm's physics of the implicate order and J. Krishnamurti's dialogues on perception while integrating Optima's touchstones: The Psychology of Lifespan Performance and Perceptual Control (LPPC) model, the Purpose‑Integrity‑Experience (PIE) triad, the Craziness Scale, and the Systemic Levels of Being Human.

Understanding Fragmentation and Wholeness is Paramount

For you, longtime readers of Optima Bowling, the current iteration of this page is an upgrade of the original. The 2021 version that seeded this discussion opened with a candid confession: understanding fragmentation and wholeness required four months of exclusive study and a disciplined appraisal of the optima bowling coach's relationship with the world. For the movement from insight to embodiment, that autobiographical note shared is the same journey Optima Bowling describes as converting latent innate potentiality into concrete intrinsic actuality. Every learner who follows this path reenacts a larger cultural drama: private control loops refine themselves until their coherence radiates outward, crystallizing into shared norms.

J. Krishnamurti and Dr. David Bohm

Bohm supplies the metaphysical backdrop. In Wholeness and the Implicate Order, he argues that reality is "an undivided flowing movement without borders," in which each apparent part "enfolds the whole and is therefore intrinsically related to the totality". If the implicate order is always present, why does fragmentation dominate ordinary experience? Bohm's answer—and Optima's—lies in abstraction. Thought carves out segments for practical ends, then forgets they are segments. The very success of analytical perception becomes its downfall when pieces masquerade as wholes.

Krishnamurti complements Bohm by turning to self-reflection. Society, he writes, is recreated daily in "the way you and I relate to our own brains, to each other, to our possessions". Fragmentation is not merely an intellectual mistake but a lived posture in which sensations, feelings, stories, and values fire in misaligned directions. Here, the LPPC model becomes indispensable. It maps perception in twelve tiers, from raw intensities to system concepts, and shows how a glitch at any tier can jam higher operations. Emotional regulation falters if the body's sleep‑wake loop misfires; if principle‑level references clash, causal vision blurs. Fragmentation is thus structural mis‑coordination among nested feedback loops.

Optima's Craziness Scale registers the lived fallout. At its lower end lie frantic oscillations (signals of loops working at cross‑purposes). At the upper end lies supple calm, evidence that lower loops have synced beneath coherent higher references. The scale does not moralize; it measures error. When the needle jitters, the learner asks: which reference is outdated? Which perception is distorted? Which action, though once adaptive, now amplifies contradiction?

The PIE triad guides the audit. Purpose reminds us that every loop serves a why. Integrity demands cross‑tier alignment (physical, emotional, mental, and causal). Experience tests hypotheses in the heat of daily events. To illustrate, consider the coach-athlete relationship once branded the author's "paramount issue" when this material first appeared online. An athlete chasing perfect form may fragment under conflicting cues; purpose clarifies the goal (repeatable shot), integrity checks body tolerance and motivational climate, and experience feeds back ball‑path data. What began as tension resolves into harmonized learning: fragmentation transmuted into wholeness through iterative control.

The Optima framework names three recurrent movements in this transmutation:

Fragmentation – the recognition of multiplicity.
Wholeness – the felt insight that parts interact.
Psyche – the interior theater where the dance plays out.

Fragmentation:

Bohm warns that thought's habit of abstracting "whatever part… we may abstract in thought" risks solidifying fragments into isolated entities. Yet abstraction is also how potentiality becomes actionable: surgeons isolate organs, and coders isolate functions. The task is not to abolish fragments but to remember they are projections on a deeper field. In LPPC terms, a reference at one level must stay transparent to supervision from levels above; management becomes tyrannical when it forgets this.

Wholeness:

Krishnamurti's educational vision is "a place where one learns about the totality, the wholeness of life… exploring the outer world… and their own thinking". Defensive loops loosen when the learner sees that self and others arise within a single implicate matrix. Emotional energy returns to the system like freed bandwidth. The Craziness Scale climbs not because conflict disappears but because contradictions are held in a wider, more conscious feedback.

Psyche:

Freud and Jung show how modern psychology wrestled with unconscious factions: id, ego, superego, anima, and animus. Optima reframes these factions as control loops with incompatible references. In this light, therapy is loop realignment: surfacing hidden references, updating them, or merging them under a higher‑order principle. Jung's "totality of all psychic processes" becomes, in LPPC diction, the full stack of nested perceptions that any moment seeks equilibrium.

How does this abstract symphony translate into daily skill?

Optima Bowling advocates finite experiments within an infinite game. Each practice cycle is finite: define a reference, track perception, act, and review. But the overarching pursuit—integrated wholeness—is infinite, echoing James Carse's contrast between games played to win and games played to continue playing. The athlete hones release angles not as an end but as a gateway to lifelong mastery. The seeker meditates not to graduate from meditation but to deepen receptivity without limit.

Potentiality and actuality supply the tempo. Every reference seed has a latent capacity; every closed loop incarnates that capacity. Fragmentation delays incarnation; integration accelerates it. The page you are now reading, revised from its 2021 predecessor, embodies the principle. Earlier drafts focused on intellectual exposition. The upgrade aligns content with Optima's matured framework so that concepts cascade like nested loops: implicate order → LPPC → PIE → Craziness Scale → experiential drills.

A sample drill: The Daily Fragment Audit. At the day's end, list three moments of friction. For each, identify the active LPPC level (configuration, sequence, relationship, etc.), articulate the reference signal, and note the action taken. Ask whether a higher‑tier reference could reconcile the conflict. If so, design tomorrow's micro‑adjustment. Over weeks, the exercise trains meta‑control, the very capacity Bohm calls insight, and Krishnamurti calls choiceless awareness.

Yet personal exercises alone cannot heal systemic rifts. Bohm cautions that social institutions ossify thought‑derived fragments into coercive structures. Optima responds with loop stewardship: leaders periodically surface institutional references, test them against contemporary data, and revise them openly. When a community bowling league updated handicap rules to foster inclusion, it enacted stewardship; when digital platforms adjust algorithms solely for engagement metrics, they betray it. Private wholeness without public stewardship risks complicity; public reform without private clarity risks zealotry.

Where, then, does the journey lead?

Not to a utopia of permanent calm but to a dynamic equilibrium in which error signals evoke curiosity, not panic. The Buddhist image of the lotus blooming in muddy water captures the mood: fragmentation persists as creative tension, spawning questions that drive evolution. The wholeness glimpsed in moments of flow or compassion is a compass, not a fortress.

Krishnamurti insists that this shift cannot be attained by technique; it arises when the observer realizes "the observer is the observed," a phrase highlighted through his and Bohm's dialogues. Control-theoretically, insight means that reference and perception co‑emerge; to change one is to change the other. When anger is observed without resistance, its reference (perhaps safety) and perception (threat) reveal their mismatch, allowing spontaneous recalibration. The athlete who "becomes the lane" senses oil patterns not as external data but as lived modulation, releasing the ball accordingly.

Recursive Complementarity

Thus, the definitive relation between fragmentation and wholeness is recursive complementarity. Fragmentation draws attention to discrete potentials (i.e., unused skills, unexamined emotions, under‑articulated values), while wholeness supplies the encompassing field in which these specifics cooperate without annihilating one another. The dance is recursive because each fresh integration becomes the launching pad for subtler differentiation and complementary. After all, neither pole is complete without its partner.

Begin with the individual nervous system. A novice bowler fragments awareness to isolate wrist angle, foot cadence, and lane target. When those elements cohere into a fluid delivery, wholeness is felt as effortless motion; yet mastery soon reveals micro‑fragments the eye previously missed: finger pressure nuances, oil‑pattern reading, adaptive spare strategy. Integration at one resolution lays bare fragmentation at the next; recursive complementarity fuels lifelong learning.

Scale up to the psyche. Emotional turbulence often signals competing reference signals, security versus novelty, autonomy versus belonging. The practitioner realigns priorities under a wider reference by tracing each impulse to its systemic tier (physical protection, emotional intimacy, mental aspiration, causal purpose). Wholeness surfaces as inner tranquility, but it is a dynamic equilibrium, continuously refreshed as new stimuli carve out finer discriminations of feeling and thought.

Expand again to culture. Social reform usually begins with a fragment, a grievance, a marginal viewpoint, or a disruptive technology. If society ignores the fragment, the Craziness Scale rises collectively through protests, burnout, or polarization. If the fragment is acknowledged and folded into higher‑level principles (let's say, equity as merit codified into law), public order will re-stabilize at a richer complexity. Yet the newly integrated principle soon encounters emergent exceptions, restarting the cycle of differentiation. Recursive complementarity thus underlies civilizational resilience: fragmentation injects novelty; wholeness metabolizes it into shared norms.

Finally, consider consciousness studies, where debates over neural correlates, contemplative phenomenology, and quantum hypotheses appear irreconcilable. Optima's perspective treats the stand‑off as a developmental phase. Each framework fragments reality along its methodological cut. The task is not a premature synthesis but integrative dialogue, a higher‑order loop in which each paradigm tests its insights against lived experience and cross‑disciplinary evidence. The resulting wholeness will not erase differences but coordinate them into a meta‑model spacious enough to house scientific rigor, contemplative depth, and philosophical nuance.

Across All Scales the Algorithm is Constant

Detect dissonance. A rising error on the Craziness Scale flags a fragment pushing for recognition.
Clarify references. Apply PIE: purpose names the value at stake, integrity checks systemic alignment, and experience designs the iteration.
Enfold and iterate. Conduct micro‑experiments until the fragment's energy is harnessed within a broader harmony.
Prepare for the next wave. Celebrate integration, then stay alert; potentiality forever exceeds current actuality.

Recursive complementarity, therefore, converts the tension between part and whole from a chronic wound into an evolutionary engine. It validates fragmentation as a messenger of latent innate capacity and honors wholeness as the stage upon which intrinsic capacities synchronize. In Optima Bowling's guiding principle, performance as the way of PIE, this engine drives the journey from scattered aspiration to integrated performance (one perceptual loop, one practice session, one cultural innovation at a time) until the expanding circumference of wholeness embraces every fragment yet unborn.

Back To: Humanity and Applied Research